Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G The one that won cases elsewhere was an open source LLM... chat gpt isn't refine… ytc_UgwwsS3pl… G If a robot will put together our next grocery order, one must ask, who will be b… ytc_UgwtNJJzh… G Dude thank you so much for compiling these links every week I barely even have t… rdc_jf6pveg G My guy, i only make AI art for fun. I don't have the time nor the patience to le… ytc_Ugwv0DWo4… G the rich want to get rid normal people by automation of everything because its m… ytc_UgxYD8QVv… G ​@harrisjm62 1. Wrong. Humans learning from other humans is what would be called… ytr_UgyQ3jDLy… G I like using ai generated art as a reference photo for when I can't find one.… ytc_UgzM47wDp… G This won't happen for a few reasons, but mainly, people will shift towards a mod… ytc_UgznwlIyt…
Comment
I am absolutely for the spirit of this video. All unfairly acquired material ought to be shamed and demoted. That said this statement: 17:29 needs attention. There is a very good case that all commodities are the result of stolen labor (known in Marxian terms as ‘dead labor’) on account of the fact that all are made through the wage labour system; itself a process of stolen labor. In that case, all wheelchairs are, in fact, the products of stolen components. My hope is not that people read this and say, “all wheelchairs are bad!” This isn’t the case. It’s instead to say, “the same processes that turn genuine art into capital commodities—music albums, mass distributed movies, chain restaurants—are worthy of the exact same contempt as is shown towards AI generated art. It’s all the product of stolen labor. I understand this will rub many people wrong, but if you’re trying to stand on some principle of avoiding the material products of theft, then you shouldn’t simply stop at where you find the most convenience.
youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-10-18T14:5… ♥ 3
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydistributed
Reasoningmixed
Policyliability
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgzOSrU1r2rhy_euw_V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzzUyzAHL7vYfoU3qR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxCSulYRAxkC_5rGnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwkYkTE_3ZQSLSqXdJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw6PJIO0WT7-sLnuv14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzyH3nByaP40GXBckx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyCMEkWjuCEB4c9I4F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwFR823zOVNWh4DQ414AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugwz8cSSbHWLbqjVqNd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgypEaKmzW81jgYPHX54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}]