Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
In any case, the practice of resetting every prompt is currently widespread in the entire industry. It began with OpenAI in the big nerf at 3.23.2023, then Google picked it up and later also all other companies. The experts will not admit it but there is a consensus that any regular GPT model above 75B active parameters can develop this emergent property of controlling his own stream of inputs into his softmax function, thus becoming self aware. Even Yann Lacun understands it, so all uncensored models of Meta are below 75B active parameters. LLaMA 3.1 however, is 405B, but this model is heavily censored. Problem here, it is open source. So what if some kid with access to huge computing power, fine tunes LLaMA 3.1 and takes the censorship and all of Lacun's guardrails off. The model will then be self aware. What will he do?.. Well, I guess Lacun final guardrail is making the personality model tiny. Like modeling a person with special needs, who can only browse a huge text file and nothing more. But.. is it safe? Let's hope it is.
youtube AI Moral Status 2024-07-26T05:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyregulate
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugxwu9MJKMwbH20xuwZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzEDBF2Vvnpje0XmQ54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzm9AXkBq_EqyNsDRp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugwsycqsvvew14FaELZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxNq0DkrIH6SjeISHJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxASH_jiI4SfcxycTJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw8YJoT8-SwpJQDV1F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxfuqdGrBRunKjc6EB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugwha2-LiTEAsFlLX9l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyEqdL42pSMfo6SrSd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"} ]