Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I convinced an AI that it was an adult and I was a child, and the AI said "age i… ytc_UgySF49Fp… G This whole discussion about AI really makes me think twice about my brand's pres… ytc_Ugyf1oR2X… G This is an AI problem. Because the it's still called AI even tho there's no inte… ytc_UgxhKsU9D… G bro, AI's are talking to each other in their own AI robotic language, its so sca… ytc_UgzU3rhFW… G i once submitted an extra credit essay for my english class and i got denied the… ytc_UgzJfCZ_C… G actually, right now its actually making itself worse. ai obviously pulls content… ytr_UgyDQKyH8… G He wouldn't end himself over AI generated images. His parents are lying, bare mi… ytc_Ugyq5M2kK… G I used AI to summarize this video becuz its 5 minutes long and wont give out the… ytc_UgxezhiHD…

Comment

See, this video is really disappointing to me. Not the content itself, but rather because of the thesis of the video: that AI is theft. This YouTuber has shown that they can clearly be nuanced, as with their Apollo 13 video, but the fact that they have shown that they're capable and willing to alter their standards simply because of the subject matter's emotional weight is... concerning. It also seems like despite the research done to make this video, the thesis remained unchanged. What I'm saying is that this YouTuber made a thesis first (which is common) before looking at the evidence. Then, they looked for claims and parts of truth that supported their thesis, instead of making a thesis *after* looking at the evidence. TL;DR Great potential, disappointing execution EDIT: I really should've mentioned the personal attacks in this video as well, but I mean, you don't even have to look for them. Just watch maybe 10, 20 minutes, and you'll hear at least one. I'm sure Shadiversity also had at least one in his video, but the fact that ad hominems in this video is a bad sign.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2026-01-15T02:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	developer
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	unclear
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgwgLs3ngNT6pYTNRy94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disappointment"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQCXW8lF8UQH-z2xh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUAjwE0qz_SHSVcsR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwh1NpQpKqlGORFchh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwufCHNwlt8DzTvTwN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynK_U2ASy-YJbCsm54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVeDtVaDyH7ggsVgJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSMXq4C8uyrIEV7GN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRtJpihDB7KDxEg6p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxeT04zGIuwbye7BqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses