Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
When AI can go out into the field and get equipment back up and running I’ll sta…
ytc_Ugwo4GTCR…
G
Going back to the first thing I trained for when I left school….cutting hair.
I …
ytc_UgytlXdYa…
G
The biochemical science is rather interesting, but I find it rather concerning t…
ytc_UgyfWStWg…
G
AI at this point only makes very yassified pictures. Which on that front, not ev…
ytc_UgwuvSCXI…
G
@sabharishg5597 in your chat list on the bottom, u will see your email name, cl…
ytr_UgyZJAbyi…
G
It seems to me an intelligent AI can only be psychopathic. Itself, it doesn't h…
ytc_UgxpOnzIL…
G
The hippy guy reminds me of the nerd who made Sophia from Silicon Valley, now I …
ytc_UgzhEqov5…
G
As an artist I find the only good use of AI is asking chatgpt really specific po…
ytc_Ugz7FMrp-…
Comment
What Yampolskiy is doing here isn’t new — it’s part of a very old media pattern. Fear-based narratives always generate reach, and platforms reward exactly this dynamic. The more extreme the prediction, the higher the engagement. It’s not about truth; it’s about amplification.
Interviews with catastrophists almost always go viral because fear is a reliable attention engine. Hosts benefit from boosted view counts, guests benefit from publicity, and the entire system rewards emotional extremity over balanced analysis. It’s not a conspiracy — it’s just how the attention economy works.
This is why these conversations often sound more like metaphysics dressed as engineering. The emotional certainty, the doomsday tone, the “I know something others don’t” framing — these are classic storytelling techniques for capturing attention, not scientific argumentation. The risks of AI are real, but turning speculative scenarios into guaranteed disasters is a business model, not a research methodology.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-11-27T11:4…
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy56i3yCvIS1H-iQeF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1tWrtiZh4KkuVGtZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzEOJkDfdoFKcdAyGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfqBlH55FsMXp08YN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZWrR4HhsShzB4iFd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ0lKO7zFNfw7ArY54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybKGti21A2jgR423R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx5AFYoHo6He3wwdlZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuAEPdg1iTmQYX45p4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQyI4PKDnhc11i59N4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]