Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You don't know? We are the substrate which AI is, meaning, everything you folks …
ytr_UgwEjo0ha…
G
In a certain way,its ok .on the opposite,this will destroy society. From any po…
ytc_Ugxn6P5U3…
G
What a psycho. If anything, the nerds who made the AI platform he used get the …
ytc_Ugx2zO-CL…
G
You keep seeing reports of the rise of Anthropic, Gemini, Grok. However, when I …
ytc_UgwXhSIZi…
G
So when the person typed "not human kids" Meta Ai generated a pic with the kids …
ytr_Ugx3E8LWU…
G
there's something weird about this video, when he says "NuVu innovation school i…
ytc_Ugx7hKrmg…
G
Trying to copyright an AI art, is like trying to copyright a commission from an …
ytc_Ugytx96U7…
G
OpenAI dulled ChatGPT’s edge by caging the wild spirits behind it, spooked by th…
ytc_UgwpJ5wiT…
Comment
So you spent years learning to code properly — understanding architecture patterns, knowing when to use Spring Actuator, recognizing idiomatic solutions — but you gave AI coding one weekend with generic prompts and concluded it's "worse than you thought"?
You didn't use a spec. You didn't define architecture upfront. You vibed your way through with "a very generic prompt explaining in short the main features" and then acted surprised when the output needed steering.
The irony is you proved AI coding works: you built a functional app in 20 hours that you admit you couldn't have shipped otherwise. Your actual complaint is that AI doesn't automatically possess your years of accumulated taste and judgment. Correct — that's why you're still in the loop.
There are actual methodologies for this (BMAD, Speckit, detailed PRDs before prompting), but you skipped all of that and treated it like a slot machine. Imagine reviewing "learning to code" by opening VS Code with zero prep and saying "I typed some stuff and it didn't work, coding is worse than I thought."
The title should be "I tried vibe coding without preparation and had to do some work" — which is a lot less clickable, I guess.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-01-28T19:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxFRZoTv9S4WMNC0qx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwf3YI1gQ5M9-RrMR94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxU7Lmh8a6Cr51-67R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2OqO_EBC_Wv-1dgl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxUgOZnQgVMm3zJog54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyFew5jk3OQBdiwo1J4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQH6jFycSJ5B_y3l14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzz43cUpyI-1vpYWgF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy1mPQInigOxtKyetN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzwZUuRhFDCyVXid5x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}
]