Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Loved this episode. Much of this talk for me was a clarification of the for…
ytc_Ugyqxt5IJ…
G
Gary makes a good point about reduced prices increasing demand... if there are s…
ytc_UgzLfXwvl…
G
We live in a simulator, yes, and because of everything a few humans are doing, t…
ytc_UgwCFUWH3…
G
Who introduces a new, unproven system into 500 locations at the start? Why are …
ytc_Ugy3spewL…
G
It’s not the AI, it’s not whatever is man-made. It’s THE men that build them. Wh…
ytc_Ugz82ZK2a…
G
I never quite thought about it like that.. I’ve heard that in that 10 second kin…
ytc_UgxJM2pI_…
G
If its not helping humanity then why invent it.....get ready the world is about …
ytc_UgzFwr8BG…
G
It is about time someone spoke about this as it is. People need to see AI as an …
ytc_UgynJvqt_…
Comment
The video is not real! Each attentive human driver could have prevented the women's death.
It is simple math: low beam head lights have a range of at least 150feet (60m).
In addition there is stray light from street lamps. The women has been in the middle of the road when she became visible.
This means at a speed of 38mph (17m/s) the time from the women becoming visible to the impact is
approximately 3.5s. Car stopping distance including "thinking time used in The Highway Code" at 38mph is 110 feet.
In the video this duration is just over a second. Note also the stark contrast in the video,
due to the data compression, shades (transitions from bright to dark) are not visible, the human eye would see a lot more.
Conclusion:
1. With a human driver, the lady would be alive.
2. The video is manipulated or of such a low quality that it actually hides the most important details.
3. Uber's automated car completely failed and its safety is worse than a human driven car.
We can only speculate if the video has been purposely edited or whether it is just the bad quality;
why is there no better video available from such a high-tech car?
why the police officer made such a bold statement based on such a weak evidence, blaming the victim?
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2018-03-25T13:1…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwZGJQVFhhfAoxyYbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyruTP4wNiUY9POttJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx61-v8wPFo15TLnm54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7nL9sDBF_EsRuC4J4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUQZPD0JvYj892xkZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmHjPsc_hvVK0MCah4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxI0QdUij0_B8-T4Cp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxIgOSX75DZyc4h6wR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyqtI8Flut6myfr0jV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzq2JwLhXDXAuDZghl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}
]