Raw LLM Responses

With all the apple, google, and other big investor AIs, I feel like their models are more human than the writers of their ads. Mostly on account of the fact they rely on actual human sources, compared to the writers that just are intrinsically unable to comprehend human behaviors and assume the people they're desperately trying to advertise to are knuckle-scraping idiots that lack any and all creativity and don't understand simple concepts like studying and doing basic research **yourself** for, say, an exam or presentation, or thinking of something to say to someone (in any scenario, be it online or real life) **yourself**, deciding what to cook **yourself**. Every ad for these AI models makes me feel like I'm being told straight to my face that I am incapable of thinking for myself. That I'm inherently stupid and need my whole life to be guided by something that runs off an algorithm (and that in reality is more faulty than it is functional, and shouldn't be relied on at all whatsoever (just look at the sources Google's annoying AI summarizer uses, and the whole premise of it to begin with)). No, I don't want an AI to help me revise for an exam with information that's has a 50/50 chance of being wrong or irrelevant. These writers assume that people are incapable of self-sufficiency and have no basic cognitive abilities. And the writers have nothing to do with the AI itself, that's the funny part. This is the tip of the iceberg. At least they don't piss me off quite as much as those liven scam ads and how absolutely 0 effort is put into them. At least these writers try, for all that's worth.