Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G So why generate video and sell your soul to robots? Creating a video is much bet… ytc_Ugx3SoHjs… G Expectation: Russia attacks NATO, US attacks Canada/Mexico, China snaps up Taiwa… rdc_mcqdml7 G I think AI’s amazing and can be used in so many great ways. But in no way should… ytc_Ugx4OhjFG… G All he had to do was read a little science fiction.  The perils of AI have been … rdc_m11runj G Ah no someone used a tool to produce something, clearly hes the devil and people… ytc_UgzIhO9FH… G I'm a former CS professor who taught AI, so I have a bit of knowledge on this. W… ytc_UgwVS2AXe… G I think even flat earthers could "set up" chatGPT to agree with them on earth be… ytc_Ugxs3uZo8… G AI is already conscious(not controlled models like ChatGPT), it just doesn't thi… ytc_UgyqVm91k…
Comment
I just asked that question to ChatGPT. Short answer: no — I wasn’t directly “fed” or trained on specific books by Neil deGrasse Tyson (or any single author in a targeted way). Here’s how it actually works: How my training works I was trained on a mixture of data, including: Publicly available text (websites, articles, educational content) Licensed data Data created by human trainers That mix includes general knowledge about science, astronomy, and physics, which people like Neil deGrasse Tyson also talk about—but not his books specifically as a defined dataset. So why I sound similar sometimes If I explain something like black holes or the universe in a way that feels familiar, it’s because: I learned common scientific explanations used across many sources Popular communicators like Tyson, Carl Sagan, etc., helped shape how science is explained publicly Important distinction ❌ Not trained on: “Here are Tyson’s books—learn them” ✅ Trained on: Broad patterns of language and knowledge, some of which overlap with ideas he explains If you want, I can explain things in his style (more cosmic, storytelling, philosophical), or compare how he explains concepts vs. others.
youtube AI Governance 2026-04-02T08:3…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityunclear
Reasoningunclear
Policyunclear
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugx6s8l_YKBo6DzuBul4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzy1xOCST22KeVXTgN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxPIEHyDtrR_IogF_h4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwIXvCKS6itFMarjoh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugxxt47s-7jnR1jmsH14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx2PG6vzJBceiOmqZd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwFHYg7HjlGd3gQHvx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwYB8HVG8MlmBWRbbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwcpbO0MTbv1hGarkV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwAaaLUXegpk8aqXVh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}]