Raw LLM Responses

Hey — I actually agree with a few of your points, and I appreciate that you’re thoughtful about the tools you do use. But there’s one huge piece missing from your entire framing: Accessibility. Your argument assumes all artists share your neurology, your executive function, your emotional regulation, and your learning style. But a lot of us don’t. I’m ND, ADHD, c-PTSD, cognitively impaired. AI isn’t a cheat code for me — it’s assistive technology. It’s my cognitive prosthesis. It’s literally how I’m able to create at all. When people say “just practice like we do,” or “don’t use AI for art,” what disabled and neurodivergent creators hear is: “Create the neurotypical way or don’t create at all.” I know that’s not your intent. But that is the impact. There are artists with: cognitive disabilities neurodivergence trauma histories executive dysfunction learning impairments And for us, AI is the only tool that puts us on equal footing with the artists who already have the privilege of stable cognition and traditional learning paths. So when anti-AI arguments ignore disabled artists entirely, it becomes — unintentionally — neurodivergent erasure. You don’t have to love AI. You don’t have to use it. Just recognize that for many of us, this isn’t convenience. This is accessibility and the right to participate at all. That’s the axis missing from the conversation.