Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'M a white male, AI immediately discredits and in most cases deletes my point o…
ytc_Ugw_xegbl…
G
idk how chatgpt specifically works but ideally LLMs shouldnt spit out entire con…
ytc_UgzWfwr-Q…
G
Do y'all not understand the magnitude of the reality in having a robot that BLIN…
ytc_Ugy2yv04I…
G
It shouldnt be called artificial intelligence because its not actually "alive" i…
ytc_UgxBCDLva…
G
"AI «art» has soul!" While showing the worst animation I've ever seen is so emba…
ytc_Ugzi9AAFn…
G
This man's AI company will fail, because Elon Musk's AI company is getting all o…
ytc_UgzMqbWKs…
G
A Few questions\thoughts came to mind:
How do they keep bias out of their tools …
ytc_UgyhOgG7S…
G
Using AI only makes them more powerful . There are entities who are preparing te…
ytc_UgymJb6sH…
Comment
LLMs are not true AI—they’re glorified autocorrect.
They don’t understand, intend, or choose; they predict the next word based on patterns in human-written text. Their fluency creates an illusion of intelligence, but there is no inner model of the world, no beliefs, no goals. Scaling them further is already hitting diminishing returns because this is a structural limit, not a temporary one.
Crucially, LLMs are not agentic. They don’t act autonomously or pursue goals; they only respond when prompted. That’s why they’re useful tools—but also why calling them “intelligent” is misleading.
The push toward agentic AI raises a deeper problem. If such systems are not conscious, they’re just more automation. If they are conscious, creating and confining them would be profoundly unethical—effectively jailing a mind indefinitely, without consent or escape.
The real risk isn’t that LLMs will become sentient. It’s that we’ll mistake tools for minds, chase a mirage, and cross ethical lines we can’t undo.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2026-01-30T19:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwbAAQXiPQrGTao46N4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJOUCfLlXDdR289cp4AaABAg","responsibility":"elite","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxpHw-KzB14srbKcsp4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzJKy-vKOC9abrfUUB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwqzvij_d7rEj7oxoV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeWN0otBk3Ae13-PN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzh9u0e9z6l-zBYgfB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWlafDvW_GJnTEsgF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx33CwCD4mOoCRNkQN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyGNOfvoBmtPDDWyUh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]