Raw LLM Responses

I always thought you were thorough and trustworthy, but this was an extremely disappointing video. It's not even clear whether these cars were using autopilot, FSD or neither when the accident happened, yet you assume they were while not even making the distinction between autopilot and FSD. You also make generic statements about "interpreting the data responsibly" without any explanation of what that even means, let alone what the method was. Then you go on to play into the viewer's emotion by calling Tesla "the world's richest car company", which is a lie no matter how you define it; cash, revenue, net income...? Also, calling removing the radar a cost-saving deletion is speculative at best, but probable even disingenuous. Tesla officially stated they removed radar because it was causing validity issues, and the safety of their cars has IMPROVED since deleting it, not decreased. So you are needlessly painting them as a greedy company, when realistically Tesla spends more time and money on safety - even though they already have the maximum safety ratings and don't gain any money from increasing it - than any other car company. Not to mention the hubris of calling removing radar "a reckless idea" when you have no expertise in radar nor AI learning whatsoever, and Tesla is one of the industry leaders. All in all, just seemed like an extremely staged hit piece, to the point where it makes me question if you were paid to do this by Tesla's competitors, which has been a theme recently as anyone who's familiar with the Dan O'Dowd saga will know. In short, if you're jumping to conclusions, telling half-truths and potentially spreading misinformation in this video, it makes me question the validity of all your other videos. Will be very difficult to rely on your advice on other matters in the future.