Raw LLM Responses

Valid points, but I think some facts have been twisted to fit this particular narrative. 3rd edit: As far as I am aware, the T-14 Armata only has an unmanned turret controlled by the crew inside the tank (just not in the turret) in order to increase survivability. I am not sure about this, but I think object recognition is different from facial recognition? Please correct me If I am wrong. Original: I thought the t-14 Armata only had an unmanned turret and that object recognition is different to facial recognition? Edit: And I think the quote that the "terminator" AFV can do the work of 30 *men is misrepresented. For one thing: it is not autonomous. My interpretation of what the arms dealer meant was that it was related to the destructive potential of its auto-cannons ATGMs etc of the AFV. 2nd edit: The drone (the actual real-life fixed-wing one that "blows up radar" (or something along those lines)) is not autonomous. It has a man* in the loop. It is a loitering munition that is controlled by a person that could, you guessed it, loiter over an area and wait for a target to appear. The operator would then have the option to attack said target. If you actually watched the entire weapons promotion video (Disclaimer: I do not endorse the sale and/or proliferation of weapons) and not the clip used by NYT, you would know that. You would also know that an attack could be aborted. *man, women, whatever.