Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Alex Jones says half of this same stuff. And this comment is going to make the a… ytc_UgxJNJDkP… G Why not just let AI do all the work bro, then we just like, tryna live without t… ytc_UgylSdTva… G I'm for progressing A.I. not turning them into weapons. One thing I don't think … ytc_UgiUvqvGK… G Good point with music, but everyone diregards writing. Writer can't even check i… ytc_Ugy5ZERzz… G The high-level problem with all this (and it's the biggest problem) is that all … ytc_UgxRH3awW… G That's f**ked up. I can't imagine DeSantis condoning this kind of predatory thug… ytc_Ugy-6mkeJ… G I will never trust AI.i never let my iPhone 15 Pro Max update. I got the last up… ytc_UgxGAYs1C… G AI will take over everything, so then the best skills for the future generation … ytc_UgyHSL72Y…

Comment

I will never say that the speaker, who is an AI researcher, is going to destroy the world. A tool is neutral, cannot destroy humans. Only humans can destroy humans. As she said, AI has bias which is influenced by the algorithms. That means we can manipulate AI by making large amounts of lies, in order to fool some people. This speech is hilarious to me. The speaker found that some AI tools are unreliable and she, therefore, invented AI tools to check the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. But, what if there is bug or limitation in the aforementioned machine invented by her? I predict that she will, therefore, invent more AI tools to counter-check the liabilities and integrities of the former AI tools developed by her, which determine the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. It sounds like a technological Ponzi Scheme. If so, in the future, she will have ten different suggestions and opinions on her desk, which are given by ten different AI tools. What she needs to do is to exercise due diligence and make independent judgement, which she did decades ago, when there was no AI.

youtube AI Responsibility 2025-04-11T03:4… ♥ 4

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzMB4jDSV5f8EWKP2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNh4QHLHBKyZJw7D54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWQyQl0B7OLkSyZzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywmlxWsma34kVeM8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOGZrl93zkHGHdDwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1D9JqBrVaiJiYau54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX-76Brm87Xft2k2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgySIonD_SuJNxE3xfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVYdkAl0q0R867jPt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQH8-xvXlGFmqz9rd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses