Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
olive_liver you're getting there, now you should realize that not every AI is tr…
ytr_UgwLD56C9…
G
So?? This is exactly how everything worked before AI as well, just on smaller sc…
ytc_Ugzq6Fm2W…
G
If you think that the 1% won't end up owning even more of the global wealth beca…
ytr_Ugwhp5CF0…
G
You are still drawing it yourself. Digital art is and has always been real art. …
ytr_UgwHsQeDT…
G
Noone is gonna have a job to be able to buy the goods and services the ai/robots…
ytc_UgyMXDRrt…
G
My real fear/anger towards AI Art is that it's developers feed it art (be in dig…
ytc_UgztAS9x7…
G
I don’t understand why we as humans can’t collectively see how bad ai is gonna b…
ytc_Ugyc-Clbh…
G
INFO is not intelligence. I got the answer/TRUTH since 2000. I got you, research…
ytc_Ugy5JdBJ8…
Comment
Just a thought here on the concern about AI taking jobs away from humans. This may in fact be a great opportunity to correct some wrongs. At the moment, and probably for some years to come we'll be adding more humans to the earths population, something the earth doesn't need, nor us, nor the other creatures that inhabit this planet with us. However, there's no special reason why there needs to be more of us. There's no magic number that once reached we stop having children. Currently, around the world most countries are in demographic decline, not because of disease, warfare, or government policy, but rather because of the choices being made by woman. Children on the farm are an asset. In the cities they are a financial burden.
If things play out gradually over time as AI develops and we adjust to that, we can cut our populations far below what they are today. Something like one or two billion people on earth is still a lot of people, but it would be much easier to employ them all with fewer of them and along with the improvements in life made possible with AI they could live very good enriching lives. It certainly would be much better for the other creatures that share this planet with us as well.
One more thing. I can't think of any reason why AI would feel it needs to remove us whether it thinks it needs us or not. What point would there be? What would be in it for the machines?
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-17T00:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyVc-UZ2dkvHyEukOV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzIjkqw5I1rcjyVDd94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXzVi5uDjkMMVemaB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzw5t6dCieY_LWUgS94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzrcUCcepluvOLZtHF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxur9JZ7QcTUAIGU3Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMjUYLcHo26T-VhLV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBykVkB0Sl533ntc14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxD6wgAoXA7K5TYuqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx299_ERZ9aYgXkBdF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}
]