Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G AI : I am the stronger Le Me : let me come their I will throw all my books😂 Wo b… ytc_UgxYiZIl6… G Seeing all of these redditor and tumblr "artists" melt down over ai and pretend … ytc_UgzfjbNIi… G Look I just want an AI housekeeper. Will treat it with total respect and love… ytc_UgyTPtrvT… G My question is they spent 28 million dollars to train her. There should be a con… rdc_cjorgk4 G Your asking why did they layoff 3,000 people..? All business usually end up with… rdc_czl8z0q G Commercial Ai is a planet/job killer! Period. Ai is Putins wartime Exit Strateg… ytc_UgzRrHI8K… G Don't worry guys there are other opportunities opening in the job market. Jobs t… ytc_Ugw6NkyPB… G Any one else notice that AI Art Stans are all neanderthals with an IQ of 2? I d… ytc_UgwCHpbo_…

Comment

I think one of the reasons that people are hesitant to trust self driving cars is that most people believe they are good enough drivers to avoid getting into a fatal crash. If that is true, then your risk of crashing could theoretically be lower than the risk of a crash inducing software malfunction. One interesting statistic I would like to see is how many of those yearly fatalities were the fault of the person that died. For example, if I am T-boned by a bus that ran a red light, I may die from that crash but it was not my fault. In an autonomous car, I would be susceptible to that same accident. However, if I were driving along and I took my eyes off the road and ran into a ditch and died, then the self driving would prevent that (barring any software bugs). In the case of fatalities, are most of those victims the victim of their own mistake? If so, then self driving would likely prevent those deaths. If most are not at fault for their fatal crash, it may not make much difference.

youtube 2023-07-28T21:3…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	mixed
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxB5rxAiOTb56L2EDd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3MjWKI1QW2f0hCWx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgykL4Q_a42Hfzsb-Gp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw5YTpGh1ca74En4gB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyx_23ILDQcjn2Pqdh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-SfffaK5C9AgrtGl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCRS5qQpTknuQJ50x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7nUD0wWXDLv1Tu594AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEl87TFSWSuNuVBRx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFPGPqkLHrC3uPYlt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses