Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I came here to make a waifu joke. That's it. It's a meta one. Now for reals; p… ytc_UgiAdQ2Jy… G The real problem is that the music industry’s current best selling music is indi… ytc_UgwRzE1AB… G A very interesting approach to this topic. I am really surprised. Well done. I a… ytc_UghR_DYsy… G Working on a startup or project where you’re building from scratch? Sure I could… rdc_jpr37ks G i cant believe there's an actual fucking subreddit about defending AI images 😭 u… ytc_UgyCaPKY4… G i keep getting this stupid ad for an ai website maker that describes the definit… ytc_UgyM-rECD… G Sorry, but her argument about carbon emissions is shortsighted. There is nothin… ytc_Ugydr7rKy… G I guess it depends what you view attorney client privilege as trying to do. So I… rdc_ohr8oh4

Comment

It should be clear to any intelligent person that what they ask AI must be verified by themselves, and that they can only do so if they are experts in the field they are discussing with AI. However, since it is difficult to have high-quality expertise in all areas, there is a risk that AI information will be accepted as given and true. This phenomenon existed prior to the development of AI and continues to exist today. Ultimately, if someone wants to gain more certainty on a particular topic, they should consult with a human expert. The interesting question is, if companies actually switch from human employees to AI, how will their business develop? If AI actually provides poor-quality answers, then this should have a significant impact on a company's revenue, right? However, if – even without AI – the low quality of work and work results is generally accepted (e.g., the film industry), then the situation looks quite different. When it comes to the question of “quality,” intellectual products are less answerable than material products (machines, for example).

youtube 2025-10-15T15:2…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	user
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	mixed
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgwuaYnJlXoFs0JWZ4d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWHrK6WQcieUFH5zB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw9h2MgPl-ICFffFft4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQZye1BRmPHtMfFCp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzksDwpK-mFz5pu61R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB5lmmzd_poG7sRg54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgygNaFzShtU0WMkBI54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzLRLskZfbwQoCQVRx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9thOw0SI7r82apJh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxykXFFof8OMceQxfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses