Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is a good argument for the radar augmented vs visual self driving systems. …
ytc_UgwUQZPD0…
G
He just wants to make sure his name lives on much longer than himself. If he did…
ytr_Ugz0HfgFK…
G
Automation is unstoppable, but the real crime is that our government is not trai…
ytc_UgxqIhFF2…
G
I feel like he double talks, he (Elon) says its dangerous yet he's making these …
ytc_Ugxz23WHT…
G
People who think that's AI can't tell what's AI or not then. Looks almost comple…
ytc_Ugz55P0S8…
G
Hold on a second, the AI Prompter is surprised that he can't charge industry rat…
ytc_Ugxzjfrsm…
G
I am so glad you discussed this topic, as an artist myself, (I think its obvious…
ytc_Ugzrg9CMj…
G
Currently doing this for a fortune 500 company. And so are my colleagues. We're …
rdc_hkfu2ll
Comment
It feels like a big part of the "AI isnt copyright infringement" argument is that we do not exactly know how any single work it was trained on influences the final result. While most other types of computer function that you apply on some artistic work (no matter how many you use as input) is still copyright infringement.
To me it sounds similar to if you tried to argue your company did not commit fraud or embezzlement because your internal finances are so complex that no one understands them.
A.I. often has simply outputted existing works, that is clearly copyright infringement. Even if they simply band-aid the A.I. by removing those outputs its still the same underlying infringing system.
Finally, humans could conceivably discover a lot of artistic styles and whatnot on their own if left alone for long enough. If the A.I. learns in the same way then if we simply speed up their simulations then they should also be able to develop artistic styles from scratch. The fact these tech bros need the existing artistic works shows that you extract something of value from it that the A.I could not create on its own.
youtube
2025-07-15T15:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzJeM4vf-99-DTSKhJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkL3E8WrwmED7eMKF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzKGAPlm4aVPNyVnih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxm9wDXvgVnmubN2FJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHen8fyC9aOdYya2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxMw5nDgqM3iSX7Hn94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBqP4mjrTUaC_cABV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjJxPzURp5SDrbVxh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw8e-1YnFPvZudnGup4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLMdNcQ3XtpBnQvP14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]