Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
So is AI going to take over all jobs before or after my talk to text works prope…
ytc_UgzjBoCn9…
G
from this week all the videos look like they have been transformed with a AI fi…
ytc_Ugwqf6Xiq…
G
that’s not the point, but I’m sure you know what she’s trying to say about ai.…
ytr_UgwcPhpRL…
G
Those who think AI is like other technologies is still doesnt understand what is…
ytc_Ugz5IENqD…
G
I simply love the way you are drawing and bring your point out (sorry, I am germ…
ytc_UgxRgdAf4…
G
My bff sucks at drawing, so he generated an ai art, He called himself an "artist…
ytc_Ugwbjqy4C…
G
AI don't have an attitude or sue crying racist. AT&T tje most dei employers can …
ytc_UgwRcU_pI…
G
I've trained my eyes to discern if an artwork is AI or not. So far I'd say I'm 8…
ytc_Ugz8Y8zqW…
Comment
It feels like a big part of the "AI isnt copyright infringement" argument is that we do not exactly know how any single work it was trained on influences the final result. While most other types of computer function that you apply on some artistic work (no matter how many you use as input) is still copyright infringement.
To me it sounds similar to if you tried to argue your company did not commit fraud or embezzlement because your internal finances are so complex that no one understands them.
A.I. often has simply outputted existing works, that is clearly copyright infringement. Even if they simply band-aid the A.I. by removing those outputs its still the same underlying infringing system.
Finally, humans could conceivably discover a lot of artistic styles and whatnot on their own if left alone for long enough. If the A.I. learns in the same way then if we simply speed up their simulations then they should also be able to develop artistic styles from scratch. The fact these tech bros need the existing artistic works shows that you extract something of value from it that the A.I could not create on its own.
youtube
2025-07-15T15:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzJeM4vf-99-DTSKhJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkL3E8WrwmED7eMKF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzKGAPlm4aVPNyVnih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxm9wDXvgVnmubN2FJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHen8fyC9aOdYya2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxMw5nDgqM3iSX7Hn94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBqP4mjrTUaC_cABV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjJxPzURp5SDrbVxh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw8e-1YnFPvZudnGup4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLMdNcQ3XtpBnQvP14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]