Raw LLM Responses

Any arguments against AI need to be tied to how the AI works. If they're not, they're pointless as you're battling something you dont' understand. If you draw something and soemone tells you that you stole the content, the ideas, the forms, the composition, the palette, whatever from them and you're sitting there knowing that you've never seen those things, you know how you came up with the idea, why you chose what you did and etc, etc why would you entertain this complaint for a single second?! While I can't speak for others, learn how it works and argue from there and I'll at least entertain your points. Oh and nightshade/glaze do not work, have never worked and will never work. If you're complaining about eco impact of AI and then use nightshade you're a hypocrite AND a fool. The AI Art world has had to make zero considerations for poisoned images. None. They don't need to do a single thing. They can train with them, just fine. If that was all they used it miiiiiiight do something. That's not going to happen. Even if every piece of original artwork was poisoned they could still just use generated images along with poisoned images and it's not a problem. Quit wasting your time on those giving you false hope. (The CEOs of anti-AI companies are making a lot of money from people like you. They're getting investment from art concerns left and right)