Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Lol, I solved dark matter/energy with GPT5. I copied the conversation and put in…
ytc_Ugz4FmzHW…
G
I was in the "ChatGPT is my therapist" crowd for almost a year and I became incr…
ytc_Ugz47XLns…
G
Blockchain micropayments could solve the copyright issue. If copyrighted materi…
ytc_UgzLnqmUq…
G
"The worst thing about the internet is that it's let people talk shit without ge…
ytr_UgwI_zqtD…
G
You explained everything wrong with AI so well!! I've always hated it, but had t…
ytc_UgzbCy6yU…
G
whatever job you do AI will be better than you in term of results. it just early…
ytc_Ugwrmoeas…
G
Yep. Those already existed. And it is also not true that devs work faster with a…
ytr_Ugy0w5gvZ…
G
Having AI do everything wouldn't work at all because people need and want to mat…
ytc_UgyJuP8of…
Comment
A lot of the money for a ubi would come from rich people paying taxes.
The only way a member of the bourgeoise can profit from this is if the money they make from people paying with their ubi is greater than the amount that this member of the bourgeoise contributed to that buyer's ubi.
So my conclusion is that ubi would only benefit those who safe more money from automation then they contribute to ubi. But if the economy becomes fully automated then only the rich could possibly contribute to the ubi and hence a new 1% of the 1% would be created.
This 1% of the 1% would be the the owners of businesses that make up a really large amount of what people want to buy.
This 1% of the 1% would accumulate money from the 99% of the 1% who contribute more to ubi then they get out of it. This is because the ubi money that profits the 1% of the 1% must be coming from somewhere and as we've established it can't bet the 99%.
I look forward to this 0.99% complaining about oppression.
youtube
2021-03-09T14:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4UwmXj8-9eUjQoJF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugznw77bkxw1KuIowWh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaZO6frH5RAULN15J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVXh3NA0-UKs7DSOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGRsyq2MoNrPVwc-p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7ClEQM6iPKWcTH2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyeYAzpSX0KZgAJil4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKqiIHphB7g9TKc694AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwObQuRUlVZqWZWZqN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZgJcWPLh277vhoaJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]