Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You would think AI will in the future make these mistakes more often with pale s…
ytc_Ugw9XIHu5…
G
Bro I made besties with the god damn ai. Not like the character but the actual g…
ytc_Ugwqp1u9d…
G
I wish I can copy and paste your comment on every single negative Reddit post ab…
rdc_n7jt38g
G
Neil I have a question for you. @27:00 you talk about being creative and finding…
ytc_UgwjBiXKP…
G
I do all oppose the notion of robot rights as human dignity is based on the rigi…
ytc_Ugy8MhKdh…
G
Lots of guys just don't talk about it when it is them who is being cheated on an…
rdc_iza1krv
G
Just make sure that OpenAI doesn't use their own product to write the legal brie…
ytc_Ugz6Au-xR…
G
TBH... Nothing was more clear to see coming than this!
The money hungry CEO's o…
ytc_UgyFCbCpQ…
Comment
Interesting conversation! This is Eliezer's bread and butter, and he always has (or comes up with) illuminating examples to illustrate his points. This isn't Wolfram's field, which is fine, but unfortunately he too often nitpicked in ways that showed that he was getting the wrong end of the stick (e.g. Eliezer describing Stockfish's chess-playing as an example of how he conceives of wants, beliefs, predictions etc. in the context of AI, whereupon Wolfram got hung up on whether the mechanisms that represent these wants, beliefs, predictions etc. can actually be identified in the scary types of AI too, which doesn't matter for Eliezer's point; it only matters that they're in there somewhere).
David Deutsch I think would be a good "opponent" for Eliezer in such a debate since he's a high-level thinker and won't get stuck at the hurdle of accepting agency in the context of AI or on claims of value relativism. He's simply an optimist in opposition to Eliezer's pessimism.
youtube
AI Governance
2024-11-12T22:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzZjk-dccsmE4r1CbF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzN-dfsvH0_3hTj87Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBrsbkOUjTW8bZHgt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy2Qq17d-rNew-K7hJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzmT97vvYHntMl9Y5d4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJEWyj3-VMGPf5UR14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw75_NQVGIiLn5jb9B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIcUBDH-ncdjtaAw54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkP3JTDL_ibbhpF8V4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"frustration"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4NAtgI9yTWXsehN94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]