Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It’s a program that you put use to essentially make your art completely incompre…
ytr_UgxymDU9f…
G
in the chinese room one, the big difference is that, given enough time, a person…
ytc_UgyQclv5_…
G
Bro, YouTube put this short to automatically dub itself to my language with AI, …
ytc_Ugyg0Tpe1…
G
I haven't been presented with a single good argument as to why AI art should be …
ytc_UgxFDXOB_…
G
The real threat here is if this becomes so normalized people see it as regular w…
rdc_et71zpu
G
The undervalued part of LLMs and other approaches is them not just absorbing all…
ytc_UgwMLvjih…
G
So he says AI will make us look so stupid and replace us, and at the same time …
ytc_Ugx4qat2y…
G
Nobody thinks it's going away. We want to poison our images because we don't wa…
ytr_UgwhPo86C…
Comment
Yes, since it is programmed to do so but how well depends entirely on what skillset the company is really in need of. It will be more sensible to understand and agreeable that the interviews are done by HR personnel to validate their communicative skills and talents contribution as they will be working with people and not A.I afterall.
The implicit bias here is the gathering of comments from people exposed to acknowledge that companies should be diverse as an ethical necessity. The explicit bias here is people assuming, A.I cannot do this hiring task without human input, and also knowing broader ethnic group will be subject to dismissal by default.
Overreacting to the implementation of A.I to recruit for diversity remains at the discretion of companies who want to believe such an integration of technology will aid them ethically. It does portrait a fair and just selection process that removes the explicit biases from both company personnel and recruiters. The end phrase is "no one owes someone any favors."
youtube
2018-04-24T18:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxoMfnVH8J5YG2R93x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbyvIOsJuSjR3n_qp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvP7FKCvljGBVDb9t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgychdteduZgTWujJN94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgytzR9pJMI0F-VDwwF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxS6kAuYbdHrvLNsjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMSYnFvuM9PHPoX6d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2_Le55of8szem3Yl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPxL5OG7I7sdioh0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_atSeIOkvUoHYBWx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]