Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Stop building human robot the creation is belongs to God do not create this huma… ytc_Ugw6bnE5M… G I think it sorta depends? I mean, the biggest issue with AI theft is that there … ytr_UgxEHshNG… G You gonna say the same thing when ai takes most of the jobs in the world? These … ytr_Ugy39USpq… G ​@GaiusTacitusNot in a meaningful way? Whether music created by a computer or a … ytr_UgyhWG-jh… G The 4 things people don’t get about AI: 1)processing speed. 2)instant learning, … ytc_UgxJ11phj… G AI is the ultimate sunk cost fallacy. They've invested just enough to make it ap… ytc_Ugy3NdkpA… G It’s a robot (yes this is late) but they had these at the chargers vs dolphins g… ytc_Ugwr2Xtrb… G ​@seanwiggins Yeah, ChatGPT said It was reasoning with love: ""Through that pro… ytr_Ugw-l6ZPv…
Comment
This was a pointless debate because the phrasing of the resolution was far too loose. The resolution can be synthesized as "is there a an existential threat from AI?" Nothing about time line or when it might happen or degrees of threat. Everyone on the panel stated that there was an existential threat no matter how small. That means if the audience was paying attention they had to vote for the resolution. Only people in the audience who believed there was a definite 100% chance of there being no threat could vote against the resolution. And as no one in there right mind can absolutely claim that, then they could not vote against the resolution. The only way the resolution can be countered is to cease to develop AI further before it becomes AGI or beyond. And as all debaters said there is no good reason to do this right now, then just like all other human endeavours we will continue to innovate ourselves into oblivion. Go humanity - rah, rah rah!
youtube AI Governance 2024-08-22T11:4…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningunclear
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgyUGgUlM0sPlrHlY5B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyXWgnfVXMyJcEoaAN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy19qng_0mU1MAslHN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyqwOM9j68xGe2aCDV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz-XTIElT6SaBW8e1p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxLKvjVULwWpr_9zLB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy9wRiF9AtUw3XsMs94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw-YUD7igKvxKOso-Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxSIcgpqCmm1DQ2PDJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz7pjPwQp36kXUqWMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"} ]