Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Wahhh wahhh…line goes up though. As long as every company wading into these AI …
ytr_Ugwjnv17z…
G
What if?? Laws were put in place: for companies to require x times/percent the e…
ytc_UgxCNFKVi…
G
@ronb7931The issue isn’t that robots will replace blue collar work. The issue is…
ytr_Ugzi_pXhd…
G
He uses it a lot, but i never get sick of the "The AI CEO's would all fuck their…
ytc_Ugx7WhntI…
G
(1) coup d'etat
(2) institutionalizing the bureaucracy of a few in place of the …
rdc_f87ub5h
G
I'm no artist, but I am disabled. I was hit by a car at 14 and my previously hig…
ytc_Ugxr3_riK…
G
@freethinkero-ub1eq Aye man, I feel you! That video has got me questioning reali…
ytr_UgyHa9QhX…
G
the thing that confuses me the mostlis that the police uses ai already, like wai…
ytc_UgzcwMSjD…
Comment
Aren't most of these "tests" really just reflections of what we think a computer/robot/program can't do? We believe computers aren't lazy (can't be) so that should be a test. Anything can be simulated, that's the point. So I believe it comes back to whether we are convinced. Once that happens then it has proven it has a moral impact on us and therefore merits some level of moral consideration.I could say that a test would include the robot's ability to reject parts of it's programming. Because we believe that a computer must do what it's told, that means it can't arbitrarily reject it's code. People can. However, can't this behavior also be faked? Now we have to add, ..reject parts of it's programming, but is not faking it. Now we've tossed the entire premise out, robots are possibly human because they are able to fake intelligence to the point that it no longer seems simulated. There seems to be no "test" that doesn't kill the whole idea in the first place. Hence, therefore (five six) it's all about how it affects you. If you believe, then it is. Ego Credo, Est
youtube
2016-09-03T02:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgijOXwzX5ll4HgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi_L9Ps1Ao3wngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjE_qt3DXc4AXgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg7AdD3sDYLcHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgicXkrK5at_b3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiQFXdWgMS6SXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghbylCg24GyCXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjxB2hYHk0ringCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UggLyqhud7inwngCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjsMxoDrjmOY3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]