Raw LLM Responses

Admittedly, I only got about half way through the video but this is just stupid. Talk about bias... First she says people have unconscious gender bias of some sort and immediately makes the assertion that this automatically means they are actively perpetuating inequality and discrimination without even qualifying these terms. She then goes right ahead pretending that this leap was logical. Next, she lists characteristics generally associated with men and women, respectively, and manages to choose three _positive_ traits for men and one _positive_, one _negative_ and one _neutral/negative_ for women. That is rather suspicious to me. She then claims that the "Implicit Association Test" says most people have "significant gender bias" which is apparently a statement with a moral connotation even though that is not supported by the experiment she described. She further claims that this "comes from" what you see on social media (how exactly has this been established as an ultimate source?) and gives the example of some list of recommended people to follow. This list is clearly sorted by "Most Followed," which is an objectively quantifiable parameter that is incidentally also quite naturally going to be a prominent criterion in any automated recommendation algorithm. This woman is either stupid or really biased and disingenuous and motivated to serve an agenda.