Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I detest. First off; if you're gonna turn off that monkey brain, it's gonna be p… ytc_UgxcjFZcB… G This is the future of the human race. But I had no idea the future is already he… ytc_Ugz5IzQc0… G Additionally, greenhouse emissions are only part of the problem (the leaky pipes… rdc_gtctubu G @MegaByteKaoshe was quite cryptic here. The way he said it’s gonna change a litt… ytr_UgxjZ85MS… G Ok AI takes over and shuts everything down but then what... if there is no power… ytc_UgyVEwaLR… G Every day I regret my decision to create a program that just hands the ability t… ytc_UgxHi0g7a… G Wasted too many hours on this website lol Don't lie, one of your AI characer wa… ytc_UgyToTpVy… G Conscious robots deserve rights because they are programmed to feel things like … ytc_UgiIQ5CNw…

Comment

To answer the main question: Implicit in the idea of progress is that we are making things better. That is, better for humanity, not merely better in itself. If we knew for sure that making better robots and AI would be bad for humanity, then no, there is no ethical duty on our part to make and improve them. The problem here is that we simply don't know if it will make things better or not. Therefore, while it is not an ethical duty to improve robots and AI, there's no compelling reason not to do so. Perhaps some time in the future it will become more obvious that it is clearly good or bad. Still the possibilities of AI taking over not just the drudge work of humanity, but practically all work, is such an interesting idea that I think I'll have to write a blog article about it (because it would be too long for YouTube comments). If I do, I'll come back and post a link to the article.

youtube 2015-02-19T19:3… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	distributed
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	resignation
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugg6_c_fnxJFiXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjBrm-BO4E1Z3gCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Uggwq5VL_P9YvngCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi28m3CG46xzHgCoAEC","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UggmA4p100IU0HgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiqEwaXkqSM-ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi0PpcKcA8VCXgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgghsB3quoCVXHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjzbO8DgHLWlngCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiclBN6LTRIL3gCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses