Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Can't wait for the day that AI destroys you and this filthy and disgusting speci…
ytr_Ugy2qeKfU…
G
If you think driverless trucks are scary, you haven't ridden in my wife's passen…
ytc_UgwtOn2Tb…
G
Well I don't think AI is wrong humans are the worst thing that has happen to thi…
ytc_UgzUQamZc…
G
AI is gonna take over and then sooner or later judgment day robots vs humans and…
ytc_UgxdGCCAJ…
G
@LaJuanHughes According to AI, the vast majority of people do not read the fine …
ytr_UgyWKpStp…
G
He's right. Plumbing is so miserable even an un-feeling robot won't want to do …
ytc_UgzonRIGa…
G
I'm very weary of AI, but as messed up as our hospitals are today, I think that'…
ytc_UgxHJDnJS…
G
Dangerous move to program the robot to fire guns. It can be reversed to kill the…
ytc_UgymlkMUM…
Comment
Then the only obvious solution would be to construct highways in which only self driving cars operate. This way, if something falls off the back of a self driving truck in front of you, your car signals in a split second to the car on it's left that it is going left RIGHT NOW. That car catches the signal and decides whether to either slow down to avoid collision (which in turn will cause cars behind it to automatically slow down), or perhaps safely swerve off of the road to the side to allow the car to enter that lane.
I just think it's illogical for a massive amount of self driving cars to drive amongst a massive amount of human driven cars. Then the effectiveness of the self-driving cars would be undermined, because their programming is logical, human instinct and split second reaction is not logical, and computers can't always take this into effect.
So a separate highway for autonomous cars would be great, since every car is in perfect sync with every car within a 100 foot radius.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2015-12-11T22:3…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgjY5ZbRHpZbl3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg6vkyHWXADQngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiE3qm0bdtqengCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggVGd5tRkaKZHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggsLujeKwbCNngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ughj07npbLjXPngCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UggP4ePx319A6ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugj-9FzhtV_B43gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UghfJlHACEBRgHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Uggx47tC_oo6mXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]