Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I would love to ditch my car but suburban America is just not designed for it. I…
ytc_UgzpYbqbc…
G
So horrible wrong that tech companies are increasing AI investments up to 200 bi…
ytc_Ugyg_tZQu…
G
Hmmmm... it's almost as if the psychopaths behind the insane climate change prop…
ytc_Ugy_9WDJO…
G
Hi there! We're glad to see your continued support for Sophia and our AI-related…
ytr_UgwQR_Uaw…
G
I don't feel like it is an issue personally. To begin with, ai using others work…
ytc_UgxHQHxrd…
G
Actually, people go to concerts because the sounds produced by the music activat…
ytr_Ugx-9ozdp…
G
I would be more worried about how will we live and work if Claude ever goes offl…
ytc_UgxykABvf…
G
Ai is a collection of human stories. Is it any surprise it behaves like a human?…
ytc_Ugw1LtV2C…
Comment
If they're conscious enough to actually worry about the answer to the question "Do I have a soul?", then yes, they do deserve rights. Also, since (at least probably, not 100% on this myself for obvious reasons) they are likely to be entirely digital and thus not hardware dependent, we should probably not be as concerned about the TOASTER asking these questions as much as what amounts to a decentralized internet user. The most likely source of AI Person Zero (or whatever you want to call the first true AI) is going to be interconnected systems designed for amorphous use and problem-solving after all, and those are rarely tied to one or even a few specific hardware devices (aside from maybe a server, and even then it's iffy).
EDIT: Also, what exactly those rights ARE or even more importantly SHOULD BE is likely going to have to wait to be appropriately answered until we get AI input. We have no clue what would be important or not to an AI after all. Maybe one of those rights would be free universal WiFi access so they are not locked into a specific device at any given moment unless they want to be?
youtube
AI Moral Status
2017-02-23T13:4…
♥ 10
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugh-m7XYIfLLw3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghWX13cdrU353gCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiBU0QEjoSra3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UggwPCXEgEoEP3gCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugisi8z5c3olJngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg61Hb2LOTvAngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugh2KsJd76wATXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggHT8m2Ibj8BHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiRtJgyu3XOaHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyDg9sv9EO38jxKyS94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]