Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
SCI FI LOVING WARCRAFT PLAYING INTROVERTED DORKS ARE CREATING A.I. WILL A.I. BE …
ytc_UgyrRY3yM…
G
Bro, she literally showed us the process of drawing it in the background, and it…
ytr_Ugzo6Qxv1…
G
I went to a private university that nit only encouraged, but required using AI. …
ytc_UgzkdCumI…
G
humans made the ai, there is/was no ai and never will be before the humans, mean…
ytc_UggKdvdoi…
G
I find it odd that a Google employee is running the media circuit, and not be un…
ytc_UgynA56ks…
G
😂 oh she’s gonna clock it for him go girl!😂 She’s letting him know what time it …
ytc_UgwBO-3rF…
G
The scientists who made and design Ai have been saying for years that Ai is it o…
ytc_UgxC9ZBYM…
G
I am amazed how fake the Trump team really is.
JD talks about AI and says the f…
ytc_UgzXpRpyt…
Comment
This is pretty simple to me.
If we're going to make concious, self aware robots then we have to give them rights - as far as I'm concerned the two are married together. It's irresposible and cruel to give conciousness without rights.
If you're going to make a "being" intelligent, and have thoughts, feelings etc then you can't NOT give them the protections too, because that's basically all "rights" are, protections for self-aware, thinking, feeling beings - human or not is just a technicality imo.
Overall though I think the whole AI thing is a bad idea, there's no real good reason for it (you can create machines to do almost any job with Intelligence short of AI, VI i think it's called?) The only reason for creating AI is because we can, and that's not a good reason, especially in this case given the potential consequences.
You don't have to be particularely intelligent to work out that creating something that is physically stronger, physically more resistant, more efficient and portentially magnitudes more intelligent down the line is a bad idea.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2017-02-23T23:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UggCabrbbmQ0r3gCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggWuRG3I2xoMHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi0YkzZoj5uFHgCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UggdjWFf4dAjwHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgipsfTjRlE4IXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UggLPC21ROMH8ngCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggLshsEzXkadHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UghS5aqRWS1YjHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggB1q9tG8ii23gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Uggpcwm-kQQjQHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}
]