Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I don't know if this figured into the case at all, but the video footage showing… ytc_Ugy8RZpce… G The debate against AI can go back and forth for all entirnity... Here's the main… ytc_UgwX_6NM2… G When I think of artificial intelligence I think of artificial beings that are go… ytc_UgzciwRo5… G What terrifies me more than AI with possible sentience and machine gun is the o… ytc_UgwASZvTP… G So many people in my programming class use Chat GPT for their weekly written pro… ytc_UgwSyoC1I… G I am not an artists or into the art stuff so I don’t get why art is different if… ytr_Ugxz_e2_L… G As an artist I have no problem with people being inspired and recreating my art … ytc_Ugy7PmXp3… G And we greatly underestimate animals. How can we tell when something puts meani… rdc_mdl3jad

Comment

This over simplies John Searle's argument and cintributes to a common misunderstanding of it. He says that a digital computer can't be conscious or semantic but he doesn't say that a robot couldn't be. I know you specifically said computer and not robot but you left the impression that he did because you were talking about humanoid robots and never limited that to ones with computer brains. Searle is a reductive physicalist. His lecture at Google demonstrates that. He simply believes that the computers we have today lack a necessary physical mechanism for consciousness and sentience. Adding more RAM, faster processing and more elegant programming won't cut it in his opinion. I think he underestimates the power of emergence but I am not certain. And the philisophical question arises: If we developed a robot that could pass the in person version of the Turring test using a computer "brain" (which even Searle admits the possibility of) would it be morally safer to grant it personhood in case Searle is wrong about emergence?

youtube 2016-08-12T14:5…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	mixed
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugjm-y_VlSp7gXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi2wDy0pT2alXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg7EsEaqcTWyXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjjLumvdyAMHngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UghgbmETgqh03ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjL299GEEWmWXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggfuTD6n0HD9ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgipEKhD38TZX3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugjvcfv2lTbNwXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Uggc9eL6NxhYungCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses