Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
How can you straight up compare ai taking inspiration with human getting inspire…
ytc_Ugzqmmf4e…
G
Maybe the devil has always been A.I. as a gate way to enter our physical reality…
ytc_Ugxl6FBlS…
G
Of its publicly available, then it should be available for anyone to use, includ…
ytc_UgxoDRE9g…
G
We are waiting for Llama3 now hopefully soon open source models will beat chatgp…
ytc_Ugz4rm_JV…
G
100% agree Sabine. Your arguments all resonate with me. Plus I believe ai will…
ytc_UgzOILuVX…
G
I think a better question to ask is why do people feel justified in harassing so…
ytr_Ugw_5_fIf…
G
AI isn't overrated, the public's intelligence level is. Stupidity is the curren…
ytc_UgwRWAsBg…
G
First, AI is not taking your job when your job depends on insight and creativity…
ytc_UgzC8ukCl…
Comment
It’s easy. Push out a bunch of ai slop, and then while the suckers are reviewing it, actually write the thing you need with zero help from AI. They’ll either accept the slop, which means you can send another slop PR, and then you continue doing the first thing you did without AI. You’ll use your tokens but if you actually do it from scratch you’ll learn. Then when shit breaks, back out your original PR and add the hand coded one. Then you’ll have code you understand that’s running.
It’s a very delicate balance though. I would try to write at least one PR from scratch without ai per week, and test it and make sure it works and stuff to the maximum extent possible, to get that deep learning. It’s super easy to game the AI stuff though, just game the fuck out of it. Have an agent just in a loop “improve the code”.
This is so bad because this is just really weird abuse of what’s known as Goodhart law [xkcd.com/2899](xkcd.com/2899) and the metric is “ai usage”.
Basically game the system and force yourself to code without AI. Good luck
reddit
AI Jobs
1777062054.0
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_oi1tqnp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_oi1xidx","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_oi2u5x8","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_oi3g3oj","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_oi42y9y","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}]