Raw LLM Responses

So as far as I know, chinese cars are mainly sold on the chinese market, so to their own populace, and in SEA in general. Europe and the US see only few of those (afaik at least). While this still makes them the biggest car manufacturer worldwide, how would not embracing neoliberalism have changed that in the slightest? I also kinda miss the point where China became world's leading robotic and specifically AI no. 1. Not even sure they're No. 2 in those regards, but I might just be uninformed on that. Your premise about neoliberalism begs the question of it being a "catastrophic mistake" from what viewpoint? From how dominant a nation is in comparison to others when it comes to manufacturing industries? From how well the people are doing? From a idealistic standpoint of "how should we treat humans and societies in general in the long term to achieve what's best for everyone"? Because I'd say properly done, with a strong government, neoliberalism is absolutely what's best for the people. They should have freedom to pursue whatever craft they prefer, be able to own property and build a future for them and their families/children. At some point, this will become more difficult to sustain because of space limitations and thus prices rising, but with proper socialist regulation, you'll very likely be able to prevent some people having literally nothing but the clothes on their body while others own whole islands.