Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Sad I had to scroll down to see this. He was not remotely a critical witness. He really just had his opinion to offer, that training an AI on copyrighted works constitutes infringement. And he's not a legal expert, so his opinion there doesn't matter in court. Furthermore, the stuff he *is* an expert on (how the LLM worked to translate input material into a language model) isn't really a point of contention that the results of the case depend on.
reddit AI Responsibility 1734934593.0 ♥ 4
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_m3bshhd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_m39rzwq","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_m3dc7yn","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_m3egt7p","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_m3bnr21","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"} ]