Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Give the empires simething and ssk for their Pproval to shift a potiin of AI to …
ytc_Ugyngg6ol…
G
Andrew Yang tried to warn us but the majority wasn't ready to listen. Ai is in …
ytc_Ugwikk-Uc…
G
I think that the companies like to say that her new AI is gaining conscience for…
ytc_UgxeiIUa2…
G
People really do have to understand why AI was developed and implemented, in the…
ytc_Ugzp2tEH7…
G
Personally, I would be happy to buy and read a book written by an AI if I though…
rdc_jdjx73n
G
I... do not trust google when it comes to AI ... I sense there is something sin…
ytc_Ugyr9EZ8m…
G
The richest billionaires in the world want to trade your town and quality of lif…
ytc_UgzZ3OEwQ…
G
crazy how i got an ad for chatgpt at the end of this video 😭…
ytc_UgwMOjzKc…
Comment
LLM's should never be used to evaluate résumés. It is as easy as that. There are way too many problems atm:
1. As mentioned the LLM will have bias from its training data
2. Future training data can get polluted by the LLM's reinforcing the bias.
3. It is a black box. We can't explain how it made the decision so how can HR justify using it? What if they are accused of breaking the law?
4. If these LLM's get popular companies start hiring using very similar patterns. If discrimination is bad now imagine all companies discriminating in the exact same way against the same people. We could end up with some people being unable to get a job for having the wrong name or date of birth
5. Companies can and absolutely will get accused of forming a cartel because they use the same LLM. It isn't that different than directly working together for price fixing instead it happens on the hiring side.
There are probably many more issues ...
reddit
AI Bias
1730492102.0
♥ 157
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_luwvnwc","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_luwz8l5","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_luzsin6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_lv1gtup","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_luxtq7d","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]