Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Well, if you made AI Bro's angry means you definitely made something right 😂 Kee… ytc_UgzCaWX9n… G All the leaders are old half in the grave they're evil leaving us with nothing b… ytr_UgyjuYl3T… G I mean I always kinda thought that we are biological machines, so what would mak… ytc_UgwhBD5Hz… G AI IS GARBAGE ELON MUSK SAID HIMSELF ITS SUMMONING A DEMON , WE DONT WANT THESE … ytc_Ugz8YKidA… G Every book ever written is inside the llms , pay once use forever, altough most … ytc_Ugy_CHZWi… G If I write an essay can I get a couple of billion dollars in funding? Amodei an… ytc_UgwTGH_bh… G So nobody has watched all these movies about Robots? Robot rights before human … ytc_Ugxh0ApZs… G @fmzaim6867 I'm saying there's no reason to use AI to make something so readily … ytr_UgxuFvK9P…
Comment
Of course a model is going to produce results consistent with its training data. It's hard for a human reviewer to purposely ignore the name, but trivial to make an automated tool to do so if objectivity is a goal. This seems like a win for including AI in a screening role. There's no reason to include the name if you don't want it to influence the score.
reddit AI Bias 1730490298.0 ♥ -4
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_luzegx1","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_luwpzp3","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_luydv9y","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_lux2f8h","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_lsaohos","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"} ]