Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G You need to adjust your moral compass. You owe us a huge apology for what you di… ytc_UgyCl1-aZ… G I don't think that those replaced jobs are fulfulling in any way... Automation… ytc_Ugz-SMp-e… G The AI will make this flaws. Very fast, very efficient. And no one will fix them… ytr_Ugyny-jGi… G @IHMyself It does not work like that and you pulled that 9 out of 10 stat from y… ytr_UgyculS1R… G Neil speaking on AI is like an ortho performing heart surgery... his media overe… ytc_UgwN2_pnC… G I'm so frustrated dealing and fighting those "AI artist" and said what they made… ytc_Ugw_zQhvz… G Well first we must define what "consciousness" is philosophically. Only then can… ytc_UgjMM-vqW… G The best joke; -Ai is writing programmes for free, companies don't need us anym… ytc_Ugw_srfSf…
Comment
Of course a model is going to produce results consistent with its training data. It's hard for a human reviewer to purposely ignore the name, but trivial to make an automated tool to do so if objectivity is a goal. This seems like a win for including AI in a screening role. There's no reason to include the name if you don't want it to influence the score.
reddit AI Bias 1730490298.0 ♥ -4
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_luzegx1","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_luwpzp3","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_luydv9y","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_lux2f8h","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_lsaohos","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"} ]