Raw LLM Responses

I expect that most of those jobs will be AI-supported rather than AI-replaced. That'll increase the productivity of those workers, which may lead to hiring more of them, because they're more valuable and more efficient. For example, I would like to hire someone to help me track my purchasing and perform comparison shopping and vendor negotiation. However, the labor required isn't justified by the potential savings. If someone were able to use AI to support that activity and get it done quickly, I might be able to afford their services. Look back on the "big data" trend. Before Google demonstrated that a large cluster of cheap computers could effectively do as well as, or better than, a supercomputer, statistical machine learning was only used for extremely valuable activities. Afterwards, it was used for all sorts of silly things, like deciding how much to bid for an internet advertisement impression. Now we have orders of magnitude more practitioners, and they earn a whole bunch more, because they're more productive. Think of all the DIY projects that homeowners do. If somehow a handyrobot were created to help with home maintenance, that wouldn't put handypeople out of business. It'd expand the industry, enabling them to serve a huge market that previously couldn't afford it. Maybe. Or if they were completely autonomous, instead of assisting, then we'd be screwed.