Raw LLM Responses

In modern economic philosophy, there are 4 classes. Capitalist, who make money entirely on their investments. The super rich. The bourgeoisie, who are the business owners. Typically referred to as 'middle class', but now that there's basically no noblemen, it's what we'd consider 'rich'. They make money off investments and ownership, more than actual physical labor. The intelligentsia is a status class composed of the university-educated people of a society who engage in the complex mental labor. These are your scientists, university professors, etc ... Then you have the proletariat, where they make money doing actual labor. When I say all economic philosophy and theory, I mean all. Capitalism suggests the capitalist is smart in his investments, and this drives the engine of production by incentivizing the other classes to work hard. Socialism suggests the means of production should be centrally owned, so there is no capitalist but rather opportunity for the other 3 classes to build wealth. Communism, also, gets rid of the capitalist by centralizing the means of production, but also does away entirely with the concept of personal wealth by also centralizing the resources. Ultimately, everyone works where the government thinks they should, makes as much as anyone else, and doesn't own anything they make. So, if AI is generally able to be smarter than everyone else, intelligentsia disappear. Right? Because there's no need for 'smart' workers. Of course, the bourgeoisie only exist to rent your house to you, or own the building you work in, so AI can't 'replace' that, if you can argue it has any value at all anyway. Then you've got the proletariat, and they can already be replaced by AI if it weren't so hard to engineer and control a human body. AI just ruins any previous system we've had for the fair distribution of goods. It can invest smarter than a Capitalist. It can own things, and hire people, better than the bourgeoisie, it's smarter than t