Raw LLM Responses

If you don't remember, here's a refresher from a select thread: [**Sharing deepfake porn could lead to lengthy prison time under proposed law**](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1992wp9/sharing_deepfake_porn_could_lead_to_lengthy/) Top comment ridiculing the law with faulty logic: >Violent criminals getting early release. Deep fake porn makers are the real threat. Clown world. Other comments that, while not exactly defending deepfake porn, were more against the law than the porn: >[This will be so hard to enforce. ](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1992wp9/sharing_deepfake_porn_could_lead_to_lengthy/kibjjmn/)   >[These laws don't make much sense. If I were to take a woman's photo and photoshop her naked \(whether I paste her head onto someone else's body or whatever\) that wouldn't be illegal. I ask a machine to do it...and that's illegal.](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1992wp9/sharing_deepfake_porn_could_lead_to_lengthy/kibvljj/)   >[Great, another unenforceable felony to pad the books. The government really loves to play pretend, don’t they?](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1992wp9/sharing_deepfake_porn_could_lead_to_lengthy/kicwxrt/)   >[Porn in the first place is protected by the 1st amendment. Gonna be tough to make this one stick.](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1992wp9/sharing_deepfake_porn_could_lead_to_lengthy/kibusuh/)   >[Deepfake a politician doing something illegal -- fine. Deepfake a public figure -- fuck the 1st amendment.](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1992wp9/sharing_deepfake_porn_could_lead_to_lengthy/kic073t/)   >[God, this is stupid. So much bullshit laws and law enforcement fighting nonexistent problems.](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1992wp9/sharing_deepfake_porn_could_lead_to_lengthy/kjcv1wf/) And that's just one thread.