Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G WOOO! And right after I delivered a speech to my class on AI-generated “art”—wh… ytc_UgxNAXhes… G I for one welcome our Ai overlords. Which is why I'm always polite to ai!… ytc_UgxWCei1-… G Codex is VERY VERY bad coding assistant. Lazy (REFUSES to read code), disobedien… ytc_UgwNV2NXt… G interesting thing I've found using chatgpt, is that the semantic of "I" and "cha… ytc_Ugw2fBU7z… G Why is the AI “art” not been noticed yet, like bro- ✨✨✨ are ppl stupid 🥰🥰… ytc_Ugy949M7w… G I wonder if the psychopaths in charge plan on starting a large war to cut down t… ytc_UgwR-tzpH… G The worst part is that these companies already know that the AI they're building… ytc_UgxVrm3f4… G I'm glad that he not only talked about it but also provided potential solutions.… ytc_UgxM5ZgVm…
Comment
This is a ridiculous title (from the underlying source) and ridiculous descriptor. It makes people think of a switch on a robot. That is absolutely not what this is. This is "if things seem dangerous we'll stop developing". There is no physical killswitch. There is no digital killswitch. It's literally just an agreement.
reddit AI Governance 1716782172.0 ♥ 52
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyindustry_self
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_l5ukbbq","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_l5w47g2","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_l5w9tm5","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_l5udih3","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_l5u7ahe","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"outrage"} ]