Raw LLM Responses

Let me try to answer it to an extent. I agree with you and even I had this same query in my mind exactly around this scenario. But let's look at it from this scenario. AI -> Automation -> Layoffs -> More Unemployment (SDEs or any other impacted roles) -> Impacted people will eventually do some low-paying job Or move to some other domain (could be high paying too, but let's consider the majority). \[Also, whomsoever is still gonna be employed in this SWE field, will be paid lesser (assumption, to create a scenario of economy where gross earning has reduced to bare minimum) \] Now, given that people have less money, so you said, how will corporate will get money from people (who buy stuff/subscription/spend somewhere/pay taxes), right? If I become poor tomorrow, I'll spend less, I'll buy cheaper products, will buy cheaper TV or anything, will eat at cheaper less fancy restaurants, will basically spend my bare minimum salary on items which I can afford. Just because you are used to your luxurious lifestyle because of high fat salary, doesn't mean you can't live on less money. People can, people do.. live with less wages also, they just spend somewhere else where you don't. Also, \[IMPORTANT\], corporates bring out their products in different countries, not at same price everywhere. They set their products price based on Purchasing power of people within that country. So, if Netflix let's say is charging you $99/month in this economic situation and after 5 years whatever we are assuming will happen, our purchasing power drastically reduces, then Netflix will eventually reduce its subscription price here to somewhere $19/month, because that's what we (majority of people) will be able to afford. Did this make sense? or you need another example? Also, you could also ask that why would the Netflix owner will take this loss by selling at lower cost? Dude, eventually he/she will also be part of the economy, where the overall prices will eventually redu