Raw LLM Responses

dude copyright is not some laws carved into stone. it exist to protect and encourage creators because the society had collectively decided thats a good thing. the issue now is not whether or not AI has violated copyright; it is whether or not we should change the copyright. what does it mean when human creators are disincentivized to create and AI works only benefit the corps? sidenote: everytime with this arguemnt of "well i can do the same thing AI does". you're not an algorithm that can pump out derivative works in lightening speed that only needs to eat electrons. you factually cannot do the same thing AIs do or have the same existential experience as a computer algorithm. so yeah, i think the distinction is actually very clear here.