Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm fine with it existing, but I get why people don't like it being called art. …
ytr_Ugwywn30t…
G
as a sorta AI guy, said it before and I'll say it again, AI is a tool, and shoul…
ytc_UgzOl_eb4…
G
Bringing up the AI doctors- there was literally a Japanese TV show about a compa…
ytc_UgyQ9m7fG…
G
Artists going against AI is basically taking back what it stole from us in the f…
ytc_Ugyb1QAz0…
G
Based on these videos Blake is clearly not qualified and does not grasp what the…
ytc_UgzpuI0m4…
G
When Markus picks up a paintbrush and starts something on his own, i will accep…
ytc_UgzsJzT-b…
G
This is a very ideal, best case scenario (for AI proponents). The recent MIT stu…
ytc_Ugw9kPiDf…
G
@LizzyGromova I use my brain to orchestrate several of the world's most intelli…
ytr_Ugwmsb6Cc…
Comment
Even aside from the cultural growth, I'd argue copyright as a concept should just be scrapped and we should go back to the drawing board on this.
As a concept, intellectual property is questionable.
Moreover, most of the world does not respect copyrights in the US. The only thing it actually accomplished is bullying soccer moms sharing some songs and give companies the ability to bully small creators. Meanwhile, there are sites all over with every movie imaginable, torrents, file sharing websites, etc.
It doesn't make sense as a policy in its current form when computers, who's primary function is copy and pasting, making perfect replicas instantly, are so ubiquitous. There needs to be a better system than what we have now, where mega companies are able to copyright claim through takedown notices.
People have lost rights to their video because a song was on a radio in the background while walking down a street, and a mega company was able to siphon money and bully the creator. On the flip side, reaction channels or twitch style streams where it's just some dude in the bottom left is able to "react" to content in its entirety.
This entire system is broken and weighs on our legal system, our culture, and is constantly the root of questionable legal outcomes. We've gone so far away from the original intent of trying to stop someone from setting up a printing press and selling and copying books they don't have rights to sell.
Now with the internet and AI, rather than try and figure out how to make this antiquated system work by retrofitting a 17th century concept, we should recognize the absurdity of it and try to modernize our institutions and law which maximizes the public good while protecting people who are creatives.
reddit
AI Responsibility
1712766352.0
♥ 7
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_kyz5nb6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_kz0uprz","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_kyzj07g","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kyzhuig","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_kyxwh04","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]