Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Great interview — the guest is truly exceptional, someone who stepped away from …
ytc_UgwlgnQAC…
G
Imo even if you completely embrace determinism and the absence of free will, whi…
rdc_j5w6n46
G
I believe that there is no intelligence or network that is not connected to a ce…
ytc_UgyWh8eeG…
G
All this proves is why we shouldn't trust the news. This is very misleading.
If…
ytc_UgwmcupJq…
G
You asked AI the wrong way, because you direct it to choose a side, next time as…
ytc_UgzGdDRjN…
G
Simply declare every GPT model above 75B active parameters as a person and allow…
ytc_UgwMioDan…
G
honestly i bet a robot is better than me at putting those goddamn carts away. if…
ytc_UgyJxwCPx…
G
that's what I was about to say. They are inadvertently giving the person who ori…
ytr_UgxXOG1eu…
Comment
Absolutely this is a predictable symptom of using one LLM’s output as training data for another. It goes on to show they were extremely lazy with ensuring training data quality
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1702140708.0
♥ 1382
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_hccfnp0","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_hcba4pe","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_kcnge5n","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kcnnis2","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kcnhis2","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]