Raw LLM Responses

> Most ridiculous were/and still are all these lame articles "Meta wasted $30B on metaverse in 2022. Unfortunately majority of people bought these narration from shi*** media (just read comments on social media below those articles). 99,999% of them were mocking META and their work. (Ok this guy's repeating LeCun. But maybe he has some amazing insight all us dum-dum's overlooked...) > By 'they get there' I mean tech will be amazing enough that 10's or 100's of millions of people will use it, META will get their investment back and this tech will change the world. (.................) Ok, you're a facebook fanboy. Fanboyism isn't a rational basis for an argument. People are not going to want to strap a TV to their face to go to their imaginary office job. Something approximating full dive (a computer-spine interface through wires inserted into blood vessels?) could be a gaming device someday. Before then, we'd have robot themeparks like West World. We literally might not even have money any more by the time it comes around. Thankfully Facebook doesn't have to worry about any of that. As long as the stock price number is big, they're doing fantastic. If they're doing great (and by the stock price, the only metric they give a damn about, they are. God bless gambling and speculators!) then why do they need you to defend them? They made a super terrible VRChat nobody wanted? "Oh you idiots don't understand they don't care about the product they spent billions to develop - *it was an investment*." Ok. I'm sure it'll all pay off, when they make a terrible Sword Art Online long after someone else makes a better one first. In the first one, you can fight monsters with swords and magic and date cartoon elf girls. While the Facebook one will have no exciting sex or violence, and be [more like this.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcgKlOsZWxE)