Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G > As news agencies published photos of Trump on a golf course, the president … rdc_gbhzg55 G But you gotta trust, it opens a whole can of worms and is so insanely tied to Ro… ytr_Ugx85ig_z… G people, people, people, " we no need to insearch far for the … ytc_UgzwQkLzF… G Sounds great! There is such a labour shortage we need more automation. Weird the… ytc_UgxPXECHa… G That was an interesting article. I don’t support the idea of consumers taking on… ytc_Ugx319Am3… G Art is using sculpting tools to make a clay bust of Pee Wee Herman. AI art us… ytc_Ugxw3cn4Z… G We already have Super AI writing things to be influential. The 2016 and 2220 ele… ytc_UgzpQDCYF… G I don't get the point of this whole discussion. You cannot program feelings and … ytc_Ugwzk_j3g…
Comment
Are their laws covering generated pr0n already? What about "underage" tentacle pr0n for example? Or cartoon, or sci-fi or some other weird sub genre. It's easy to enforce age laws when it's a) real people and b) their age is known. When neither of those are true, do laws apply? How? This (not "ChatGPT bad") is the real AI safety discussion point.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1695566640.0 ♥ 5
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityunclear
Reasoningdeontological
Policyunclear
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_k20eafg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_k20hk66","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_k1zwre5","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_k21qrce","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_k1zxpcu","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"} ]