Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
That AI hack is hilarious. For years we saw researchers confusing AI tech with p…
ytc_Ugw8z9pyH…
G
@InspireAponso I asked Google AI: Data centers are not inherently carcinogenic,…
ytr_UgyBevvUX…
G
I could catagorically prove that an Ai + Person can do the job that would cost a…
ytc_UgwyMWe7I…
G
Of course Kurzegasgt is part of the problem and only tells half of the truth. Ho…
ytc_UgxWp86tP…
G
The devs 'rolling' their eyes at this point in the AI cycle are just behind the …
ytc_UgxVZ7Qxd…
G
LLM vs AGI. Big difference between the two. Which one in Open Ai building? Decen…
ytc_Ugxfpfhck…
G
We dont want it in our lives. We are being taken over. Sure some things are good…
ytc_Ugx_9XcAl…
G
@miketyson8236 „It’s not an algorithm”
Uhm, it is.
„It’s a neural network”
Be…
ytr_UgylRiEX-…
Comment
'Our facial recognition software is 99.9% accurate!'
'So in a city of 1,000,000, it will identify 1,000 innocent people as the criminal?'
'... Next question!'
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1691428870.0
♥ 173
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | utilitarian |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_jv5ygb8","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jv66sea","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jv5x07i","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_jv6nblp","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jv5x73b","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]