Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@jasetheace37 yes, banning deepfake apps. Like apps that can put someone's else …
ytr_Ugz4YcyS6…
G
Huge damn W right here i watched the og video and making even more is amazing as…
ytc_UgyKkhG4A…
G
"I'm worried about the labor impact and how fast it's moving" - The guy who is p…
ytc_UgwS__vNC…
G
Remember: There is no such thing as AI. Only LLM exists. So no, don't fear from …
ytc_UgxVZwQUG…
G
Yet here you are on YouTube which is owned by Google, a company that is leading …
ytr_UgyahHkTa…
G
@TGPDrunknHick Ah no! Sorry for the vagueness! They commissioned me, and honestl…
ytr_UgzFG9jN-…
G
No they are not. It's sad to see how you get your view that's worse than AI, muc…
ytc_UgwjbD9zV…
G
If you treat it like an enemy and goad it like boxers before the fight will my…
ytc_UgxQ7SZGV…
Comment
It's funny, because everyone that have tested and used the local models for a while mostly agrees that they are really far behind for example ChatGPT. [A bit of discussion around it](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/13gpnhq/addressing_the_elephant_in_the_room/)
Part of this misunderstanding comes from various factors, from tests being very one dimensional to using very un-scientific means to compare *(like letting chatgpt rate each model)*, and some trying to find the comparison that shows their pet model in the best light.
So that google paper and the resulting discussions and panics are largely built on a false premise. Still, it's pretty interesting to see how the industry is reacting to this perceived threat.
That said, I really hope open models keep on evolving and becoming better and better, and some day surpass OpenAI's models while still being able to run on normal hardware.
reddit
AI Responsibility
1684316475.0
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_jkjuinl","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_jki4lv5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_jkha19r","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jkgipyl","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jkiii9s","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]