Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@big_POSTS the ai just with honesty checked and found out black people are more …
ytr_UgzA5nwOF…
G
I understand your concern, but as an AI, he does not possess emotions or persona…
ytr_UgwmQYcwe…
G
That is one of the easiest to detect. My company uses AI text->voice and even wi…
ytr_UgwmNygsZ…
G
Why would they even make a news story about AI videos once they knew they were f…
ytc_UgyowVaL6…
G
We are not nearly evolved enough for AI....in a short time most people will be c…
ytc_UgzonYyRb…
G
Nope, not worth mentioning. Q* and similar approaches handle this - in the near …
ytr_UgzHLt5lE…
G
So my company has not replaced any job with AI. They have however replaced a lot…
ytc_UgzcP3Gv8…
G
AI is dangerous bro, it will surely reduce jobs and please watch terminator thos…
ytc_UgxCtodPi…
Comment
It's probably not incorrect as much as incompetent at doing such task. That is chat gpt3.5 at least. gpt 4 has already improved various of this factors and acknowledges if it dosent know or there are different points of views
reddit
AI Governance
1681068175.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_jfr19z1","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_jflttlv","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_jfqjgf3","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_jfny7do","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_jfkk5xz","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]