Raw LLM Responses

I’m a teacher and I agree with you in principle. However, since I find a lot of teachers are self-assured on this matter, consider this: What if the classroom as we know it disappears entirely? Children do the work from home, interacting with each other over video chat or IM during breaks. The learning apps are able to access other data on devices to be given a good enough psychological profile — when they get distracted and go on social media, when they’re listening to music while learning — and they are able to adjust accordingly (in the way that Duolingo knows to reduce the volume on Spotify for some questions and stop it entirely for others). The learning will also be gamified, using avatars and prizes and in-game purchases. I’d like to act like this is far fetched, but the truth is that we already use a bunch of this stuff in education — ClassDojo, Quizlet, Blooket, Habitica, Seneca, Kahoot. The truth is that in a capitalist economy, AI education doesn’t need to be designed to help students in terms of psychological profile and care. It just needs to get them to learn so that they can become workers, so the AI teaching tech will always be focused on engagement over safety, even if in the long term it means a future where kids with ADHD and ASD will be both highly intelligent and incredibly antisocial. Essentially, you’re approaching education in a humanistic way because you’re a good teacher, but I don’t think that’s necessarily what non-Nordic governments want out of their education systems.