Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Great Interview,and true👍💯
However....
Mr.Greed says: "No basic needs for free!…
ytc_UgyatNVvM…
G
You should read the ai con. You're falling into some of the marketing cons.
Ye…
ytc_UgyZ88Slr…
G
@Synapse88 ai isn’t just limited to digital stuff. Machinery powered by ai can t…
ytr_UgzQI0oXE…
G
“Hi. I’m Disney. Here’s a subpoena to discover if literally any of our commercia…
ytc_UgzPqcWsj…
G
you can't really argue with chatgpt as it already has been programmed to be pro-…
ytc_UgzjYnqHN…
G
Exactly. People treat it like it's the holder of some hidden truths.
It just pr…
ytr_UgwfKA7jT…
G
Yeah, devs need to adapt along with AI or be left behind. Depends on the salary,…
ytr_UgxH9db-1…
G
Why did you not ask him why he created something he could not protect us from?
…
ytc_UgxjNs8Nv…
Comment
If you have a false negative rate of 0% and a false positive rate of 0.01% (99.9% accurate) then you seem like you have a very good algorithm.
The problem is that applying this to a VERY large pool that is known to be filled with people without whatever trait you are looking for is that 0.01% of that pool is a LOT of people. If you're looking across the entire US population for a single person that committed a crime this will return:
True Positives: 1 \* 100% = 1 person
False Positives: 331,449,280 \* 0.1% = 331,449 people
​
So now your criminal is actually only 0.0003% of your "guilty" pool.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1626260612.0
♥ 30
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | utilitarian |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_h5415fw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"rdc_h54t138","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_h5429ez","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_h54hw5v","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_h553r3q","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]