Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
To you the Tesla owner, if you feel the need to use your stupid AI, how about yo…
ytc_UgwCuPHyC…
G
I tried but if Schmidt doesn't know the data from AI is from the invasion of pri…
ytc_UgwbbnvhR…
G
You can also ask ChatGPT about being an LLM and it will very clearly tell you it…
ytc_UgzLQrFDr…
G
Hello, Prof. Hawking. Thanks for doing this AMA!
Earlier this year you, Elon Mu…
rdc_cthnpg0
G
AI art, if one chooses to call it art infests pretty much every kind of "normal"…
ytc_UgxeB6Jzk…
G
NO!!! Do not and I repeat DO NOT get or give consent to AI. Leave your human emo…
ytr_UgydbbllI…
G
that's true AI image are impossible to use as reference, but another thing that …
ytc_UgwwvCdzl…
G
Does facial recognition, provided it actually works and has the necessary oversi…
rdc_fvz4nzg
Comment
There's nothing inherently in the algorithms for facial-recognition that "destroys privacy".
It's just a tool (like any other tool). The important part is HOW you use it. (not WHAT it is).
reddit
AI Surveillance
1580428206.0
♥ -1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_fg0u1zp","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_fg0gf0u","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_fg0g6k3","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_fg0dgxb","responsibility":"technology","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_fg1jg9y","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]